So Abram went up from Egypt to the Negev, with his wife and everything he had, and Lot went with him. Genesis 13:1
So Abram said to Lot, “Let’s not have any quarreling between you and me, or between your herdsmen and mine, for we are brothers. Is not the whole land before you? Let’s part company. If you go to the left, I’ll go to the right; if you go to the right, I’ll go to the left.” Genesis 13:8-9
Abram had been discovered as a liar in Egypt, in regards to his true relationship with Sarai. After Pharoah became aware that the two were married, rather than siblings, he forced them out. Abram took Sarai, his belongings, and Lot with him. Abram had become very wealthy during his time in Egypt. (Thanks to Sarai) We are told that Lot had gained many riches as well. With both men having had livestock that needed a fair amount of land, problems ensued. After a time, disputes arose between the two men’s herdsmen.
Abraham saw the potential for bad blood with his nephew, so he suggested that they part ways. He figured there was enough land to satisfy them both, and gave Lot first choice. In whichever direction Lot chose to travel, Abram would go the opposite. Lot set out toward the east and the plains near the Jordan, which were well watered. His tent was pitched near Sodom. Abram lived in the land of Canaan.
The Lord then told Abram to look around him – North, South, East, and West. He promised that the land, as far as Abram could see, would be given to him and his offspring. Further, Abram was promised that his offspring would be like the dust of the Earth, or too many to count. Abram’s tent was moved to Hebron, where he set up an altar to God in thanks.
This is the story of two men who develop conflict. This is the first description, in the scriptures, of how such conflict (man versus man) is to be handled.
Respectfully nip conflicts in the bud…Abram saw conflict approaching. Though it had not yet arrived, he sought to end it before it began. He went to Lot and, respectfully, expressed his concerns. He then stated that perhaps it would be best if they parted company. In that way, each of them would have what they required and the relationship would remain intact. (How many men, Christian or otherwise, would do that today? I suspect very few.)
Walk by faith, not by sight…Lot chose the east, the land of the plains of Jordan. He chose the area because of the water and proximity to Sodom. It mattered not that he left his uncle the land that was dry. It mattered not that Sodom was well-known for its wickedness. He sought to increase his wealth, and his selection would have given him such an opportunity. Lot was not described as a wicked man, himself. We do get the impression that he was willing to abide with and suffer others sinful deeds if he would profit. Abram showed no discontent with being left the drier land. He did not heckle or bargain. He accepted Lot’s choice, as he said he would. He had to have known that he, too, could gain more wealth in the land Lot had chosen. Yet, he had faith that God would see to the needs of he and his family. (If you are anything like me, you know many more Lots than you do Abrams. Good men put up with all manner of evil in search of the almighty dollar.)
Have confidence in God’s promises…After Lot had left, God promised that all the land surrounding Abram would belong to him and his offspring. Abram and Sarai were an older couple, with no children. It would have been easy to laugh at the idea that he would have innumerable offspring, especially at his age. But, what did he do? He believed. He had every confidence that God would keep every promise made. He established his altar, and gave thanks. He expressed joy and gratitude for things that had yet to happen. (And are there any men who would have this type of faith? Let me know when you stop laughing.)
Finally, keep in mind that today is the day of Pentecost. In the Old Testament, Jews knew this as the Feast of Weeks. (A sacred day when no work is to be done. It is a day to express gratitude for the abundant wheat harvest.) Christians know this to be the day the Holy Spirit filled the bodies of over one hundred men and women after Christ’s death. The Holy Spirit gave them knowledge and confidence to spread the Good News of Christ’s life, death, and resurrection. In essence, it was the beginning of the church. The goal of the church was, and is, to add to the dust, or offspring, promised to Abram.
Being referred to as a child of Abraham (Abram) is a compliment to most Christians. Abram is the father of the Hebrews who would be given land that we now know as Israel. This man originally came from a town that worshipped pagan idols. What reason did he have to leave his father’s house and religion? What reason did he have to leave all that he knew? There was none but faith. He was not perfect, by any means. (See previous blog) He made mistakes, but he believed. He accepted the spirit of God, as disciples would years later, and followed where it led.
Isn’t that what we are supposed to do? Aren’t we supposed to take the “word of God written on our hearts” and do something with it? How often do Christians follow the Spirit’s lead? How much more frequently do they expect the Spirit to follow theirs?
Too many times, we seek fault in others because we enjoy conflict. We are selfish and greedy. As long as there is something in it for us, we accept hatred and wickedness. We are self-righteous and expect to have our way. When that doesn’t happen, we feel persecuted.
Is that where the Spirit leads you? Because the spirit inside me leads me to come up with compromises that benefit everyone, avoiding conflict wherever possible. It leads me away from greed. It gives me the courage to stand up to those who would place profit over people. It strengthens my faith to know I am not who I was. I am confident that I can encourage and support others, because I feel encouraged and supported.
The spirit inside me, the spirit of love, demands to be given away. I obey and give it to as many as I can. Because it was given to me.
Posts Tagged With: corruption
My mother and brothers are those who hear God’s word and put it into practice.
Luke 8: 21
As the name of this blog is Faith and Politics…..I feel the need to speak a little on how religion and politics relate to one another.
Good night, folks. Thanks for coming out.
Seriously. Here’s the thing. Religion and politics are not the best of friends. They are not even associates. Heck, they can barely stand the sight of each other. And while that may sound harsh; it is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth….so help me, God.
You see, our government is founded on the principle that no single religion shall be the foundation of public policy. I could go on and on. I could cite numerous writings by Adams and Jefferson. I could cite the entire Treaty of Tripoli. But, that is not necessary. Well, ..er..it shouldn’t be necessary. It seems it may be. Too many people seem to labor under the illusion that we are a “Christian nation”. Of course, we are not. We are a nation consisting of mostly Christians. This is not just semantics. It actually means two different things. One implies that our government was based upon a Christian belief system and reflects biblical principles. However, the truth is that our government was designed to work without Christianity, leaving that decision up to each individual citizen.
On the flip side of that coin: Christianity was not designed with government in mind. In truth, Christianity is the name we call ourselves because we believe in Christ and his teachings. Never once did Jesus say, “You will start a new religion and name it after me.” What he did say is very clear. Render therefore unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s – Matthew 22: 21. This is not open to interpretation. He said, very clearly, that God does not belong in the government and the government does not belong in the church.
Now that we have cleared that up, we can stop introducing the two at parties. We can forget all about future blind dates. We can realize that they are the two kids who need to be separated for everyone’s peace of mind. Whew! I am so glad that is settled.
Wait. It is not settled. The government feels bombarded by religious sentiment. There are any number of laws on the books (both federal and state) that are written simply with the religious in mind. With an ever-increasing number of agnostics, atheists, Muslims, and other faiths; government is attempting to live up to the constitution’s guarantee of freedom from religion. Religious organizations are refusing to comply with federal laws. The government is, basically, refusing to become a church.
The church feels persecuted and excluded. Christians feel like they are being targeted for harassment and abuse. They are furious that their leaders won’t legislate based upon religious doctrine. They cite the Bible for all manner of objection to abortion, gay marriage, and other issues. They fear Muslim infiltration and Sharia Law. Christians, basically, wants the government to become a church.
Now, before anyone yells that I am just taking up for a corrupt government, let me say this. I agree that there is corruption in the system. I agree that our politicians behave as though they don’t have to answer to us, their constituents. I even agree that there are some who would love nothing more than to do away with religion completely. That being said, Christians need to accept some responsibility. It has been my experience that the majority of non-believers just want to be left alone. They do not wish to have their lives dictated to them, by a God they do not believe in. They do not wish to have politicians making decisions about what they do with their bodies. (Because of a God they don’t believe in) They don’t want to be told who to love or marry by some senator. (Because of a God they don’t believe in)
And, since our country is neither a Christian nation nor a church…they have that right.
Christians need to worry only about being Christians. I will give you a moment to read that opening scripture again. <<…Humming…>> Okay, ready?
Christians were given one important commandment by Christ. He even says it is the greatest commandment…love each other. That’s it. It sounds ridiculously simple, right? Well, it is not. Jesus is very explicit about how we are to behave as his followers. We are to love one another. We are not to seek revenge or vengeance. We are to respect the fact that we are responsible for ourselves, and only ourselves. We are to be good to people: feed them, clothe them, house them. We are to forgive. It should be our goal to be like Christ, no matter what the world throws at us. Our faith is to be recognized by sight, not by speech. They will know we are Christians by our love.
Where is our love? Love is not spewing hate and vitriol. It is showing compassion and kindness. Love is not stereotyping and judging. It is offering comfort and support. Love is not casting the first stone, even as we live in glass houses with a hundred cracks. It is forgiveness and a helping hand.
These traits are hard to develop. They are difficult to express. They are practically impossible to demonstrate with perfect consistency. But we should try. Why?
Because…What would Jesus do? That is what Jesus would do.
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days – and also afterward – when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown. Genesis 6:4
I always found this passage a bit puzzling. It’s location and total lack of context brings many questions to mind. The Nephilim were the offspring of the sons of God and the daughters of men. (They would later be known as the giants who inhabited Canaan.) Does the phrase “sons of God” refer to the angels? Were the Nephilim inherently evil, thus becoming part of the reason for God’s drastic decision to flood the world?
Ancient Jews understood “sons of God” to mean angelic beings. This view would be corroborated in 1 Peter 3:20 and 2 Peter 2:4-5. If the Jewish interpretation is to be trusted – that they are angelic beings – we run into another dilemma. Looking forward in the text…We learn that Jesus, in Matthew 22:30, said that angels did not marry. That would mean that we could infer that producing children wasn’t on the to-do list. Procreation, outside of a marital union, was extremely taboo.
We do, however, learn that angels did not always do as they were told. And the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, he has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment of the great day—Jude 6. It is important to note, though, that the author of Jude used pseudepigraphical literature as reference material. Pseudepigrapha are books claiming (falsely) to be written by some ancient hero of the faith, such as Moses or Abraham. Yet another conundrum is the fact that these demigods, as lawless and wicked as their behavior was, were known as heroes. But to whom? I can only assume they would be considered heroic to those who perished in the flood.
I, personally, believe this mention of the Nephilim was to teach that even heavenly beings sin. Not only that, they will face punishment. Considering the fact that we are still in the section of the Bible known as The Law, this is not terribly surprising. This is the period, in the faith, where works is focused on more than faith. It is also my opinion that those telling this story would need a truly wicked sin to recount, in order to explain and/or justify the near total extinction of the human race. What is more wicked than wayward angels cavorting with humans and creating progeny that brings nothing but sin and evil?
I would also like to add that genealogy, found in Genesis, should probably be taken with a grain of salt. The book has Shem outliving Abraham! And, let us not forget that female offspring barely receive an honorable mention. Again, I will reiterate that these accounts had been handed down generation after generation. Another thing worthy of remembering is that the lineage we are given only tells us how various groups/nations relate to Israel.
No novice to gossip, I am equally pretty sure a little bit of that 2nd grade gossip thing was happening, too. You know, little Sarah says “I gotta pee.” By the time we get to the sixth kid, it’s “Sarah peed on herself and wants you to tell the teacher!” And, well, let’s be perfectly honest. How many of us could regurgitate our entire history orally, and get it all right?? Not too many, I would assume. I am certainly no threat to ancestry.com.
Lastly, I would like to point out another detail that stuck out to me. The ages of the characters prior to death will begin to drop, dramatically, after the death of Shem. Shem, the middle son of Noah, lived to be 500 years old. I am convinced that ages were fudged, to begin with. However, I feel that this marked decrease in lifespans is due to change in climate and landscape post flooding. Naturally, after a major catastrophic event, you might see lack of food and other environmental changes that could lead to human beings living shorter lives.
Next up: Abram (Abraham), the first faithful